Questions, Feedback & Help
Send us an email and we'll get back to you ASAP. Or you can read our Frequently Asked Questions.

WormBase Tree Display for Interaction: WBInteraction000544061

expand all nodes | collapse all nodes | view schema

Name Class

WBInteraction000544061Interaction_typeRegulatoryChange_of_expression_level
InteractorInteractor_overlapping_geneWBGene00003096Interactor_typeTrans_regulated
Other_interactorNypa fruticans root butanol extractInteractor_typeTrans_regulator
Interaction_summary"we tested the effect of these candidates on the expression of a host immune effector using transgenic worms carrying a transcriptional GFP reporter for the lys-7 gene... The transgenic animals were infected by S. aureus in the presence and absence of antiinfective candidates and fluorescence intensity was visualized and compared at 24 and 48 hours post-infection (hpi). As shown in Fig. 1A and Fig. 1B, at 48 hpi, nematodes infected by S. aureus in the absence of anti-infective candidates showed a significant reduction in the overall GFP intensity as compared to the uninfected population fed on the normal food source, Escherichia coli OP50. The uninfected worms showed a consistently strong green fluorescence along the intestine throughout the observation period (Fig. 1A) whereas S. aureus-infected worms exhibited weak fluorescence except at the posterior part of the intestine (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, among the anti-infective candidates tested, the UE-12 extract was able to prevent suppression of GFP expression by S. aureus (Fig. 1C). By contrast, UE-01-4, UE-03-6, UE-11 and UC-10 failed to prevent the suppression of GFP expression by S. aureus (supplementary material Fig. S1)."
Detection_methodReporter_gene[lys-7p::gfp]
Regulation_levelTranscriptional
Regulation_resultDoes_not_regulateLife_stageWBls:0000041
Anatomy_termWBbt:0005772
PaperWBPaper00045438
RemarkFig. S1; Staphylococcus aureus infection