Questions, Feedback & Help
Send us an email and we'll get back to you ASAP. Or you can read our Frequently Asked Questions.

WormBase Tree Display for Picture: WBPicture0000011636

expand all nodes | collapse all nodes | view schema

Name Class

WBPicture0000011636DescriptionFigure 3. Developmental profile of ftt-1 and ftt-2 ex- pression patterns. Total RNA samples from embryos (lane 1), L1 larvae (lane 2), L2/L3 larvae (lane 3), L4 lar- vae (lane 4) and adults (lane 5) were isolated, and 10 mg of each RNA sample was separated on an agarose gel and sized according to RNA molecular mass markers (BRL). The RNA panel hybridized sequentially with the ftt-1 cDNA probe (A), the ftt-2 cDNA probe (B), and 28S rRNA probe (C). The representative autoradio- graphs in A to C were scanned densitometrically across lanes to quantitatively analyze stage specific changes in individual transcripts. These results were converted into graphic form after normalizing the data for sample load- ing variations using the 28 S rRNA marker. The lowest level of each transcript was set to an arbitrary value of 1 in order to optimize comparisons of a single transcript between the staged worms. Direct comparisons cannot be made between different transcripts, since the relative abundance scales are not comparable.
NameFigA.jpg
DepictExpr_patternExpr678
Expr680
AcknowledgmentTemplateWormBase thanks <Journal_URL> for permission to reproduce figures from this article. Please note that this material may be protected by copyright. Reprinted from <Article_URL>. Copyright (<Publication_year>) with permission from <Publisher_URL>.
Publication_year1997
Article_URLDOIid10.1006/jmbi.1997.1002
Journal_URLJournalofMolecularBiology
Publisher_URLElsevier
ReferenceWBPaper00002793