Questions, Feedback & Help
Send us an email and we'll get back to you ASAP. Or you can read our Frequently Asked Questions.

WormBase Tree Display for Expression_cluster: WBPaper00031252:AIN-2_IP_enriched

expand all nodes | collapse all nodes | view schema

Name Class

WBPaper00031252:AIN-2_IP_enrichedDescriptionmRNAs that were significantly enriched in the AIN-2 immunoprecipitation samples, compared to the control total mRNAs in the input extracts (p < 0.01).
SpeciesCaenorhabditis elegans
AlgorithmSignals from replicates of total worm lysates from wt and strains containing the ain-2::gfp or the ain-2 promoter::gfp transgene were mean normalized and averaged respectively to generate standard profiles of gene expression in these worm strains. Authors then calculated the ratio of signal of each gene from each IP sample to the standard gene expression profile of the corresponding worm strain. Based on this ratio, a percentile rank of each gene relative to all genes in each IP replicate was calculated. The percentile ranks in the three replicates of each IP were averaged. Student t test was utilized to determine if the average percentile ranks of enrichment of individual genes were significantly higher (p value) than the mean enrichment of all genes in the IP samples. To determine the AIN-1 or AIN-2 associated genes, we used the following criteria: (1) average percentile ranks of enrichment is greater than the mean enrichment of all genes in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP with p < 0.01; (2) average signal in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP replicates is greater than the background signal (including 2X standard deviation (SD)) (Background signal and SD were calculated based on signals from empty spots on each microarray); (3) criteria 1 is not be satisfied for the same gene in the corresponding control IP.
ReferenceWBPaper00031252
Microarray_results (1995)
Gene (1784)
Attribute_ofMicroarray_experiment (12)
RegulationRegulated_by_geneWBGene00015007