Sensitivity to gentle body touch is mediated by the MEC-4 channel complex, which contains two pore-forming components, the DEG/ENaC proteins MEC-4 and MEC-10. MEC-4 is essential for the function of the complex, but the role of MEC-10 has been difficult to interpret. The
mec-10(
u20) missense allele changes the ion selectivity of the mechanoreceptor current (MRC), suggesting that MEC-10 is part of the complex in vivo. Yet, unlike MEC-4, MEC-10 does not form a functional channel alone or with MEC-2 and MEC-6 in Xenopus oocytes. MEC-10, however, alters the amiloride sensitivity and reduces the total current of the MEC-4d, MEC-2, MEC-6 channel complex in oocytes. This last property suggests that wild-type MEC-10 may negatively regulate channel function. Although
mec-4 and
mec-10 encode similar proteins, initial screens for touch insensitive mutants yielded approximately ten times more
mec-4 mutations than
mec-10 mutations. Subsequent sequence analysis revealed that the
mec-4 mutations included nonsense and missense mutations and deletions. The five characterized
mec-10 alleles are all recessive and contain only missense mutations, four of which are clustered around the putative pore region of the channel. These results suggest that the existing
mec-10 alleles may not be loss-of-function mutations. A mutagenesis for non-complementing alleles of
mec-10(
u20) was inconclusive, yielding only a few alleles that produced a Mec phenotype. A deletion mutation [
mec-10(
ok1104)] produced by the Knockout Consortium results in animals that are weakly touch insensitive (responding at least half the time when touched). MRCs in these animals are qualitatively similar to those observed in wild-type animals, suggesting that, despite contributing to the pore of the mechanotransduction channel, MEC-10 is not an essential component. We have investigated the effects of mutant MEC-10 proteins, corresponding to the characterized
mec-10 mutants, on the MEC-4d and MEC-2 current in Xenopus oocytes. As before, we find that wild-type MEC-10 reduces the amiloride-sensitive current produced by MEC-4d and MEC-2. The current is further reduced by one of the MEC-10 mutant proteins and virtually abolished by the other four. This reduction is not explained by a decrease in the surface expression of MEC-4d, since surface expression of myc-tagged MEC-4d is unchanged in the presence of MEC-10. In addition, GFP-tagged wild-type and mutant alleles of MEC-10 all co-immunoprecipitate equivalent amounts of myc-tagged MEC-4d. These results support the hypothesis that the Mec alleles of
mec-10 are recessive gain-of-function mutations and are consistent with a role for MEC-10 as a negative regulator of the MEC-4 channel complex.