[
J Med Microbiol,
2013]
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia plays an important role as an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised individuals. Despite its clinical implication, the true knowledge regarding the pathogenicity of these bacteria remains unclear. Various methods have been employed to prove this bacterium to be pathogenic. However, the debate whether S. maltophilia is a true pathogen or a colonizer still remains unanswered as effective killing was not seen in earlier experiments with different animal models of infection (Denton et al., 1998; Adamak et al., 2011; Pompilo et al., 2011). Study by Rouf et al. (2011) on murine lung infection model illustrated that different strains of mice exhibited different outcome for S. maltophilia infection. Strains such as A/J and DBA/2 were permissive for clinical isolates of S. maltophilia and showed higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, BALB/c and C57BL/6 strains were non-permissive for S. maltophilia. While Huang et al. (2009) showed nematotoxic activity by environmental S. maltophilia strain against free-living nematode, Panagrellus redivivus, and plant-parasitic nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.
[
FEMS Microbiol Lett,
2008]
In vitro mimicking of the stimuli controlling in vivo-inducible bacterial promoters during infection of the host can be complex. Therefore, the use of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was evaluated, as a surrogate host to examine the expression of Salmonella enterica promoters. Green fluorescent protein (GFP+) was put under the control of the promoters of the pagC, mgtB, sseA, pgtE and fur genes of S. enterica. After infection of C. elegans with an S. enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine strain expressing these constructs, clear bacterial expression of GFP+ was observed under the control of all five promoters, although significant expression was not always obtained in vitro. It is concluded that C. elegans constitutes a useful model system for the study of the in vivo expression of Salmonella promoters.