- WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_downregulated
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets.
Transcripts with significantly decreased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).
- WBPaper00045263:isp-1(qm150)_upregulated
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets.
Transcripts with significantly increased expression in isp-1(qm150) vs. N2, and in isp-1(qm150) ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).
- WBPaper00045263:isp-1(qm150)_downregulated
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets.
Transcripts with significantly decreased expression in isp-1(qm150) vs. N2, and in isp-1(qm150)ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).
- WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_upregulated
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets.
Transcripts with significantly increased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).
- WBPaper00044246:pgrn-1_ced-3_ced-1_downregulated
Differential expression analysis was performed using the EdgeR Bioconductor package (19910308), and differentially expressed genes were selected based on False Discovery Rate (FDR Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-values) estimated at <=5%.
Genes differentially expressed in pgrn-1(tm985), ced-3(n717) and ced-1(e1735) as compared to N2E.
- WBPaper00044246:pgrn-1_ced-3_ced-1_upregulated
Differential expression analysis was performed using the EdgeR Bioconductor package (19910308), and differentially expressed genes were selected based on False Discovery Rate (FDR Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-values) estimated at <=5%.
Genes differentially expressed in pgrn-1(tm985), ced-3(n717) and ced-1(e1735) as compared to N2E.
- WBPaper00044246:pgrn-1_ced-3_upregulated
Differential expression analysis was performed using the EdgeR Bioconductor package (19910308), and differentially expressed genes were selected based on False Discovery Rate (FDR Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-values) estimated at <=5%.
Genes differentially expressed in pgrn-1(tm985) and ced-3(n717) but not in ced-1(e1735) as compared to N2E.
- WBPaper00044246:ced-3_ced-1_upregulated
Differential expression analysis was performed using the EdgeR Bioconductor package (19910308), and differentially expressed genes were selected based on False Discovery Rate (FDR Benjamini Hochberg adjusted p-values) estimated at <=5%.
Genes differentially expressed in ced-3(n717) and ced-1(e1735) but not in pgrn-1(tm985) as compared to N2E.